Decisions

The complainant alleged that Health Canada did not respond to an access request within the 30 day or extended period set out in section 7 of the Access to Information Act. The request was for records from specific dates related to parliamentary proceedings in 2021 and 2022 to obtain certain documents related to the Public Health Agency of Canada and the National Microbiology Laboratory. The allegation falls under paragraph 30(1)(a) of the Act.

Health Canada is deemed to have refused access to the requested records under subsection 10(3).

The investigation revealed that, despite having completed consultations and finalized the processing, the response to the access request was then put on hold.

Health Canada advised that the request was placed on hold because, at the time of the planned response to the complainant, it was informed by one of the Offices of Primary Interest (Corporate Services Branch - Security) that multiple investigations into the incident at the National Microbiology Laboratory were still ongoing.

The Information Commissioner advised that the conduct of Health Canada in relation to the request was neither authorized nor justifiable under the Act, as the Act does not authorize an institution to “pause” the response to an access request pending the outcome of an investigation. Furthermore, the Information Commissioner stated that concerns relating to the sensitivity of the information or the impact its disclosure could have on ongoing investigations are appropriately addressed through the timely application of exemptions.

The Information Commissioner notified Health Canada of her intention to order Health Canada to provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 36^th business day following the date of the final report.

Health Canada gave notice to the Commissioner that it had already provided a response to the access request. Therefore, the Commissioner advised that it was not necessary for her to issue an order to that effect. 

The complaint is well founded.

The complainant alleged that Canada Post had improperly withheld information under subsections 19(1) (personal information) and 18.1(1) (trade secrets of Canada Post), and paragraph 20(1)(b) (confidential third-party financial, commercial, scientific or technical information) of the Access to Information Act in response to an access request. The request was for the final version of a health and safety strategy report for Canada Post delivered by DuPont Sustainable (DSS) and any related invoicing. The allegation falls under paragraph 30(1)(a) of the Act.

The third party deferred to Canada Post’s position about the application of paragraph 20(1)(b). Canada Post could not show that certain information met all the requirements of subsection 18.1(1) and paragraph 20(1)(b). With respect to paragraph 20(1)(b), it did not show that some of the withheld information was not publicly available, that it was supplied by the third party, or that there was a reasonable expectation of confidentiality.  Under subsection 18.1(1), Canada Post did not show that the information was a trade secret or that it was the confidential financial, commercial, scientific or technical information of Canada Post.

The Information Commissioner ordered that Canada Post disclose certain information.

Canada Post gave notice to the Commissioner that it would implement the order.

The complaint is well founded.